Print

[Pikmanipulator]

I said I never once said I could show exactly what the pictures show! So you have no grounds to penalize me.   

Then what exactly are you trying to prove?

[hinata2000100]

Then what exactly are you trying to prove?

That those ballet pictures weren't the embarrassing pictures of Rainbow Dash. 

[Xirdus]

'Wouldn't be scared' is already past tense. There is no past tense of past tense.

I've always used it as "softer" version of 'won't' Thanks.

Twi said Celestia brought him to Equestria, in the first part.

Could you post link with timestamp? I really don't remember that (especially that Judge appears in the second part, not first).

And what if our world is their imagaination?

It's highly unlikely. Why? Show me one fanfic created before today that mentions group of ponies obsessed with humans. No luck? It is because imagination doesn't normally work that way. And if ponies' imagination work that way, it is not imagination anymore (at least not as we know it).

[ZeusAssassin]

Wow! Looks like my one little find sparked quite a conversation. But, from watching that scene with RD countless times, we know that her embarrassing hobby must be something quite feminine. It has been proven time and time again that RD is uncomfortable with feminine things like hooficures, trying on new dresses, etc.

It's gotta be something that tarnishes her image as a tough pony athlete. Being a ballet dancer is still a likely option because it's a hobby, something that goes against what RD is known for, and something that can be done in private. No pony is going to force you to perform if they never see you practice. 

hinata2000100, I expect better proof if you hope to convince me and other people on this board about other possibilities. It's faulty logic if you claim that quote is true simply because it is. Don't beg the question, k?

[Pikmanipulator]

That those ballet pictures weren't the embarrassing pictures of Rainbow Dash. 

I said I never once said I could show exactly what the pictures show!

 

[hinata2000100]

hinata2000100, I expect better proof if you hope to convince me and other people on this board about other possibilities. It's faulty logic if you claim that quote is true simply because it is. Don't beg the question, k?

Again, I wasn't trying to prove anything other than the fact

That those ballet pictures weren't the embarrassing pictures of Rainbow Dash. 

That's all. Nothing more. That conversation was the only evidence I had. I never said my evidence was solid.

[Pikmanipulator]

Again, I wasn't trying to prove anything other than the fact That's all. Nothing more. That conversation was the only evidence I had. I never said my evidence was solid.

What do you base this fact on, though? I fail to see how that quote proves that those pictures don't involve ballet. I'm not saying they do, necessarily, but still, where is your logic?

[hinata2000100]

What do you base this fact on, though? I fail to see how that quote proves that those pictures don't involve ballet. I'm not saying they do, necessarily, but still, where is your logic?

Because, does 'I bet you have skeletons in your closet too' sound like it has anything to do with ballet? 

[Pikmanipulator]

Because, does 'I bet you have skeletons in your closet too' sound like it has anything to do with ballet? 

The idiom "skeleton in the closet" is used to describe an undisclosed fact about someone which, if revealed, would have a negative impact on perceptions of the person, as quoted from Wikipedia.

So in Rainbow Dash's case, yes. It very well could be. 

[hinata2000100]

The idiom "skeleton in the closet" is used to describe an undisclosed fact about someone which, if revealed, would have a negative impact on perceptions of the person, as quoted from Wikipedia.

So in Rainbow Dash's case, yes. It very well could be. 

oh.  You see, I didn't know that was an idiom. 

[Pikmanipulator]

oh.  You see, I didn't know that was an idiom. 

Oh, now I see what you were driving at.

Well, now you know. 

[hinata2000100]

Oh, now I see what you were driving at.

Well, now you know. 

So now everyone wins!   

[Koopakirby]

Just like to quickly post my predictions/deductions. Spoilered for your conveinience:

Spoiler (click to show/hide)

Sonata is NOT the killer. Trixie is the killer. Sonata is most definitely an accomplice of some kind, though. Trixie is the killer because of what I believe are Psyche-Locks in Part 2 and her knowledge of them crime being so immediate.
Lenora/Cruise Control are involved, but not in the direct murder.
The brown feather is not from a griffon, it was from Owloicious.
The missing letter was dilevered to the murderer, and its contents some incited them to commit it.
The perfume was delayed from the beginning. The missing letter is a "Not coming" letter.
Applejack is hiding something.
Whatever Pinkie was looking for will be case-making.

[Xirdus]

Trixie is the killer because of what I believe are Psyche-Locks in Part 2 and her knowledge of them crime being so immediate.

Does Trixie have Psyche-locks? I don't remember. Could you post link with timestamp?

The missing letter was dilevered to the murderer, and its contents some incited them to commit it.
The perfume was delayed from the beginning. The missing letter is a "Not coming" letter.

If I understood correctly, murderer committed crime because of delay in perfume delivery?

Applejack is hiding something.

Impossibru.

[Koopakirby]

Does Trixie have Psyche-locks? I don't remember. Could you post link with timestamp?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s07W4-A7HQw&context=C4b4227bADvjVQa1PpcFOCZ0t60Rg0oilzjX5udK13yj6DrRI87fg= 30:50 With the knowledge that Twilight can see them, These being Psyche-Locks is very probable.

If I understood correctly, murderer committed crime because of delay in perfume delivery?

Not exactly. The killer is a victim of blackmail. Not being returned what they were promised is upsetting, yes? One of my theories is that the letter did not specify what wasn't coming. It's a weird theory anyway.

Impossibru.

Search your feelings, you know it to be true.